← all emotions · markdown (agent skill)

Sexual Lust conditioning guide

Target: EmoNet Sexual_Lust strength. reward = (genu + blend + 1.25·emo)/(1+WER).

TL;DR. Best with the LoRA at 50%, and by a wide margin — reward 0.775 vs 0.521 prompt-only and 0.671/0.598 at higher merges. Run the evolved prompt + 50% merge; it nearly doubles reward mainly by boosting vocal-burst blend (0.430 to 0.635) at low WER cost (0.214). The trade-off is speech quality/clarity: qual dips 0.565 to 0.498 and Articulation Clarity correlates strongly negative (-0.46), so delivery turns breathy and less crisp. The emo strength stays modest (0.071) — this LoRA sells the emotion through breathy vocalizations, not lexical arousal — so don't push to 150% (emo rises to 0.18 but reward drops and WER hits 0.52).

Without a LoRA

Best: evolved prompt, no LoRA → reward 0.52
GENERAL: A voice unmistakably expressing sexual lust, a husky, sultry voice, low and breathy, thick with desire and longing, pouring out. SCRIPT: (huskily, low and breathy with desire) "<neutral sentence>" · temp 1.0 top_p 0.95 top_k 25

With the emotion LoRA (dose)

50% ★ — reward 0.78 · emo 0.07
genu 0.17 · blend 0.63 · qual 0.50 · WER 0.21
100% — reward 0.60 · emo 0.10
genu 0.14 · blend 0.44 · qual 0.50 · WER 0.35
150% — reward 0.67 · emo 0.18
genu 0.19 · blend 0.50 · qual 0.46 · WER 0.52

Conditions

conditionrewardemotiongenublendqualityWER
neutral prompt, no LoRA0.49-0.000.110.450.630.27
evolved prompt, no LoRA0.520.010.140.430.570.19
evolved prompt + LoRA 50%0.780.070.170.630.500.21
evolved prompt + LoRA 100%0.600.100.140.440.500.35
evolved prompt + LoRA 150%0.670.180.190.500.460.52

Side effects & correlations (LoRA @ 100%)

↑ pushed up: Emotional Numbness (+0.87), Malevolence Malice (+0.66), Intoxication Altered States of Consciousness (+0.56)
↓ pushed down: Mask Resonance (-0.38), Articulation Clarity (-0.29), Conversational Style (-0.28)
+ correlates: Infatuation (+0.62), Malevolence Malice (+0.58), Pleasure Ecstasy (+0.54)
− anti-correlates: Oral Resonance (-0.59), Articulation Clarity (-0.58), Background Noise (-0.53)

Conclusion

Best with the LoRA at 50%, and by a wide margin — reward 0.775 vs 0.521 prompt-only and 0.671/0.598 at higher merges. Run the evolved prompt + 50% merge; it nearly doubles reward mainly by boosting vocal-burst blend (0.430 to 0.635) at low WER cost (0.214). The trade-off is speech quality/clarity: qual dips 0.565 to 0.498 and Articulation Clarity correlates strongly negative (-0.46), so delivery turns breathy and less crisp. The emo strength stays modest (0.071) — this LoRA sells the emotion through breathy vocalizations, not lexical arousal — so don't push to 150% (emo rises to 0.18 but reward drops and WER hits 0.52).